NEWS
NEWS
HOME > NEWS > Industrial news > Details

CONTACT

Industrial news

Difference Between Gyratory and Cone Crusher: A Detailed Comparison Guide

Release time:2026-01-19 Views:0
In mining, aggregate production, and construction, gyratory crushers and cone crushers are essential for crushing hard materials like granite, limestone, and ore. While both serve the purpose of reducing material size, understanding the difference between gyratory and cone crusher is critical for selecting the right equipment—directly impacting efficiency, production costs, and project outcomes. This guide breaks down their key differences in design, working principle, performance, and applications, helping industry professionals make informed decisions.

1. Design & Structural Differences

The fundamental difference between gyratory and cone crusher starts with their structural design, which shapes their functionality and use cases:

Gyratory Crusher

  • Core Structure: Features a large, fixed outer shell (concave) and a rotating inner cone (mantle) mounted on a vertical shaft. The shaft is inclined at a 15-20° angle, and the cone rotates eccentrically around the vertical axis.

  • Feed Opening: Has a large, circular feed opening (typically 300-1500mm) designed to accept large, uncrushed raw materials (up to 1.5m in diameter).

  • Size & Weight: Bulky and heavy-duty, with a tall, cylindrical profile. Industrial models can weigh hundreds of tons, requiring permanent installation in fixed crushing plants.

  • Key Component: Equipped with a heavy-duty mainframe and a spider bearing assembly that supports the rotating shaft, ensuring stability during high-load operation.

Cone Crusher

  • Core Structure: Consists of a smaller, vertical outer shell and a rotating inner cone. The shaft is vertical, and the cone rotates with a smaller eccentricity (5-10°) compared to gyratory crushers.

  • Feed Opening: Smaller feed opening (typically 50-300mm) designed for secondary or tertiary crushing of pre-crushed materials.

  • Size & Weight: More compact and lightweight than gyratory crushers, making them suitable for both fixed plants and mobile crushing units.

  • Key Component: Features a hydraulic or mechanical adjustment system for gap control between the cone and concave, allowing precise control of output particle size.

difference between gyratory and cone crusher 03

2. Working Principle Differences

The operational mechanism is another critical difference between gyratory and cone crusher, influencing their crushing efficiency and output quality:

Gyratory Crusher

  • Crushing Action: The inclined rotating cone creates a continuous crushing zone between the mantle and concave. Raw materials are fed from the top, and as the cone rotates, they are gradually compressed and crushed between the two surfaces.

  • Crushing Process: Utilizes a "compression crushing" principle, with materials moving downward through the crushing zone in a spiral path. The continuous rotation ensures a steady, high-volume crushing process.

  • Speed: Operates at a lower rotational speed (80-150 RPM) compared to cone crushers, focusing on high torque for breaking large, hard materials.

Cone Crusher

  • Crushing Action: The vertical cone rotates eccentrically, creating intermittent compression between the mantle and concave. Materials are crushed in a series of short, intense impacts as the cone moves closer to the concave.

  • Crushing Process: Combines compression and impact crushing, with materials being crushed multiple times as they pass through the crushing chamber. The smaller eccentricity results in a more uniform particle size.

  • Speed: Operates at a higher rotational speed (150-300 RPM), enhancing crushing efficiency for medium to fine crushing tasks.

3. Performance & Capacity Differences

When comparing performance, the difference between gyratory and cone crusher is evident in capacity, output size, and energy efficiency:

Gyratory Crusher

  • Capacity: High production capacity (500-10,000 t/h), making it ideal for large-scale mining and primary crushing operations. It can handle massive volumes of raw materials without frequent downtime.

  • Output Size: Produces coarse to medium-sized aggregates (20-100mm). It is not designed for fine crushing, as the crushing process is less precise.

  • Energy Efficiency: More energy-efficient for primary crushing of large materials, as the continuous crushing action minimizes energy waste.

Cone Crusher

  • Capacity: Lower capacity (50-1,500 t/h) compared to gyratory crushers, suited for secondary, tertiary, or quaternary crushing.

  • Output Size: Produces fine to medium-sized aggregates (5-40mm) with uniform particle size distribution. It is ideal for producing high-quality sand and gravel for construction projects.

  • Energy Efficiency: More energy-efficient for fine crushing, as the higher rotational speed and impact crushing action reduce the need for multiple crushing stages.

4. Application Differences

The difference between gyratory and cone crusher directly translates to their application scenarios, with each equipment tailored to specific project needs:

Gyratory Crusher

  • Primary Application: Used for primary crushing of large, hard raw materials in mining (iron ore, copper ore, granite) and aggregate production. It is the first stage in a multi-stage crushing process.

  • Ideal Projects: Large-scale mining operations, quarries producing coarse aggregates, and infrastructure projects requiring high-volume primary crushing (e.g., dams, highways).

  • Material Suitability: Excels at crushing hard, abrasive materials with high compressive strength (≥200 MPa).

difference between gyratory and cone crusher 02

Cone Crusher

  • Primary Application: Used for secondary, tertiary, or quaternary crushing of pre-crushed materials. It is often used after a gyratory or jaw crusher to refine the particle size.

  • Ideal Projects: Construction projects (high-rise buildings, bridges), concrete production, and sand making. It is also suitable for mobile crushing units used in road construction and demolition waste recycling.

  • Material Suitability: Suitable for crushing medium to hard materials (compressive strength ≤300 MPa), including limestone, river pebbles, and ore tailings.

5. Maintenance & Operational Differences

Maintenance requirements and operational complexity are additional factors that highlight the difference between gyratory and cone crusher:

Gyratory Crusher

  • Maintenance: Requires less frequent maintenance due to its robust design and fewer moving parts. However, maintenance tasks (e.g., replacing the mantle and concave) are more complex and time-consuming, often requiring heavy machinery.

  • Operational Complexity: Simple to operate, with minimal adjustments needed during operation. It is designed for continuous, long-term use in harsh mining environments.

Cone Crusher

  • Maintenance: Requires more frequent maintenance (e.g., replacing wear parts, adjusting the hydraulic system) due to the higher rotational speed and intense crushing action. However, maintenance tasks are more accessible and can be completed quickly.

  • Operational Complexity: More complex to operate, as operators need to adjust the crushing gap and monitor the hydraulic system to ensure optimal performance. It offers greater flexibility in adjusting output size.

Conclusion

Understanding the difference between gyratory and cone crusher is essential for selecting the right equipment for your project. Gyratory crushers excel at high-volume primary crushing of large, hard materials, making them ideal for large-scale mining and quarries. Cone crushers, on the other hand, are designed for secondary/tertiary crushing, producing uniform fine aggregates for construction and concrete production.
By considering factors like design, working principle, capacity, application, and maintenance, industry professionals can choose the equipment that aligns with their project goals, maximizing efficiency and reducing costs. Whether you need to crush massive raw materials or refine aggregates to precise sizes, recognizing the unique strengths of each crusher ensures optimal performance and project success.

Last:what is a sand making machine
Next:there is none left